Our Basic Policy of Corporate Governance
Advantest's Purpose & Mission is "Enabling Leading-Edge Technologies." Advantest constantly strives to improve so that we can offer products and services that will satisfy customers around the world, and contribute to the future of society through the development of the most advanced technologies.
In accordance with the corporate mission described in the preceding paragraph, by being open, honest and respectful at all times with all stakeholders, Advantest aims to achieve a sustainable level of business development and enhance corporate value over the mid-to-long term. Advantest always strives to find the best solution to issues, by seeking out root causes and defining their "essence". To that end, Advantest will establish a fair, efficient and transparent governance system.
Corporate Governance System
The global business environment is changing more rapidly than ever before, due to factors such as technological advancement and impact of geopolitical risks. To continuously increase our corporate value and competitiveness in today's world, we emphasize swift decision-making and execution. We also place an emphasis on sound, highly transparent business operations in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. In order to meet these challenges, we draw clear lines of authority within our organization and set responsibilities in accordance with each management function, assigning each role to the best person for the job.
We have become a company with an Audit and Supervisory Committee since June 2015. Advantest further strengthened its corporate governance and Board of Directors' audit function as a company with an Audit and Supervisory Committee, where the committee members use their voting rights in Board of Directors Meetings with the aim of further increasing our corporate value. Furthermore, we have established a structure that can quickly respond to the rapidly changing business environment, and in order to strengthen our corporate governance, we introduced an Executive Officer system in 2003.
| List of Governance Systems (As of July 31, 2026) | |
|---|---|
| Structure | Company with an Audit and Supervisory Committee |
| Number of Directors | 9 |
| Number of Outside Directors | 5(55.5%) |
| Number of Non-Japanese Directors | 2(22.2%) |
| Number of Female Directors | 2(22.2%) |
| Term of Office for Directors who are Not Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 1 year |
| Term of Office for Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 2 years |
| Number of Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 3 |
| Number of Outside Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 2 |
| Chairperson of Audit and Supervisory Committee | Outside Director |
| Nomination and Compensation Committee | In place |
| Nomination and Compensation Committee Members |
3 Directors (2 of which are outside Directors) |
| The Chairperson of the Nomination and Compensation Committee | Outside Director |
| Performance-linked Remuneration System | In place |
| Executive Officer System | In place |
| Executive Officers | 29 |
| Non-Japanese Executive Officers | 17 |
Please see the information below for the Corporate Governance Report.
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors, as the decision-making body for management, decides on important matters such as Advantest's overall management policies and strategies, while supervising the execution of operations by the executive body. The Company has strengthened the monitoring and supervisory functions of the Board of Directors by having a majority of Outside Directors and by separating the roles of Group CEO and Chairperson of the Board from April 2024, with a non-Executive Director serving as the Chairperson of the Board. In July 2025, the BoD Administrative Office was established under the CEO Office as the department responsible for the Board of Directors' secretariat. To ensure that the Board of Directors serves as a forum for effective and substantive discussions, the BoD Administrative Office provides various forms of support, including information provision to independent outside directors, and by enhancing the environment to facilitate meaningful deliberations.
In FY2025, Regular Board of Directors' meetings were held for approximately 3 to 5 hours per session to deliberate. To ensure that the discussions of the Board of Directors are reflected in the operations of the executive side, issues and advice raised by outside directors are clarified, and the status of the executive side's response to these issues is reported at the next meeting of the Board of Directors. In addition, the board holds offsite meetings once a year to discuss matters that cannot be discussed within the regular meetings. At the Board of Directors' meetings and offsite meetings, directors with wide knowledge and experience express their opinions from each point of view on various agendas, and active discussions take place.
In FY2025, the main discussion and reporting items of the Board of Directors meetings and offsite meetings were as follows.
-
Based on the "Grand Design," the mid- to long-term management policy reviewed in 2024 from a long-term perspective, the Board of Directors approved revisions to the Targeted Management Metrics of the "Mid-term Management Plan (FY2024–FY2026)" to reflect recent changes in the external environment and the progress of business performance.
-
To enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, a board evaluation was conducted using a questionnaire administered to all directors. Upon receiving a report on the results of the evaluation and analysis covering the overall Board of Directors' meeting, including its operation and the status of discussions in FY2024, the Board of Directors discussed such results.
-
In order to promote the delegation of authority that enables both fairness and transparency of management and prompt decision-making, the Board of Directors discussed matters to be submitted to the Board of Directors and the criteria there for, and approved amendments to the Regulations of the Board of Directors and the Executive Management Committee.
-
The Nomination and Compensation Committee provided advice regarding the enhancement of executive compensation systems aimed at providing sound incentives that contribute to enhancing the Advantest's corporate value and ensuring global competitiveness, and the Board of Directors approved the proposal.
-
The Board of Directors discussed the composition of the Board of Directors and the selection of director candidates from July 2026 onward, based on the report from the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
-
The Board of Directors received a report from the Nomination and Compensation Committee on the Group CEO evaluation, which had been conducted by the Directors excluding those concurrently serving as an Executive Officer, together with the Group CEO's comments on such evaluation.
-
The Board of Directors also discussed measures to accelerate the development and strengthening of next-generation and subsequent-generation management talent that will contribute to the succession planning for the Group CEO and other CxO positions, which had been discussed by the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
-
To realize the provision of high-performance total test solutions that meet future customer needs, the Board of Directors received reports from management on the progress of various strategic investment initiatives aimed at building strategic partnerships across the semiconductor supply chain, and discussed these matters.
-
The Board of Directors reviewed capital allocation in line with the growth strategy, discussed the mid- to long-term capital policy taking into account growth investments, shareholder returns and financial stability.
-
Amid a significant increase in demand for high-performance computing chips and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) driven by the rapid expansion of generative AI, management reported on initiatives to strengthen the overall business process from procurement to customer support—through collaboration among R&D, production, sales, and field service functions, with a view to enhancing the supply capability of testers and technical services, and the Board of Directors discussed these initiatives.
-
Based on the fourth strategy set forth in the Grand Design, "Enhance sustainability," the Board of Directors received reports on specific measures and progress under the Sustainability Action Plan 2024–2026 established under the Mid-Term Management Plan.
-
The Board of Directors received reports on feedback from shareholders and investors, as well as market evaluations, obtained through IR activities, including dialogues with shareholders and investors, conducted by management throughout the year.
-
Compliance reports were provided 4 times a year and internal audit reports twice a year. The Board of Directors received 41 reports on compliance-related incidents, including whistleblowing cases via the helpline, as well as on the internal audit framework and findings.
Attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and important committee meetings in fiscal year 2025 is as follows.
As of July 31, 2026, the Board of Directors of Advantest (including Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members) is composed of 2 executive Directors (Inside Directors), 2 non-executive Directors (Inside Directors) and 5 non-executive Directors (Outside Directors). 2 of the Directors have non-Japanese nationalities and 2 are female Directors. In order to maintain seamless communication despite the diversification of Directors, Advantest has arranged for simultaneous interpretation at the Board of Directors meetings so that Board members can speak freely in both Japanese and English. Materials and minutes are also translated into English.
Evaluation of the Board of Directors' Effectiveness
To evaluate the effectiveness of its roles and responsibilities, the Board of Directors conducts an annual survey of all Directors to collect and analyze their opinions on the composition, deliberations and operations, response from the executive side, and the support system for the Board of Directors.
(Action in FY2024)
In the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors for FY2023, it was found that the number and composition of the Board of Directors were appropriate, and sufficient discussions were held regarding the succession plan for the Group CEO. However, there were areas identified for improvement, such as the consideration of rapid response measures to changes in the external environment, time management of the Board of Directors, and onboarding support for new Outside Directors. Based on these evaluation results, the following actions were taken in FY2024.
-
The executive side reported the results of investigations into changes in the external environment that could affect Advantest’s performance.
-
To ensure thorough discussions at the Board of Directors meetings, explanatory materials were submitted to the directors in advance for their review, and presenters were asked to provide concise explanations with organized issues and points. Additionally, Directors shared information and exchanged opinions outside of the Board of Directors meetings as needed.
-
As an opportunity to provide more detailed business explanations to Outside Directors, online briefings on individual businesses and business strategies were held. Additionally, a visit to manufacturing contractor was conducted in conjunction with offsite meetings.
(Results in FY2024)
In the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors for FY2024, it was found that the separation of the roles of Group CEO and Chairperson of the Board of Directors, accompanying the transition to a new management system, increased the neutrality of the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, leading to more appropriate operation of the Board of Directors. Additionally, it was confirmed that the Board of Directors is holding discussions contributing to the medium- to long-term enhancement of Advantest’s corporate value.
On the other hand, the following point was identified as an area for improvement to make the Board of Directors more effective.
-
It is desirable to quickly capture changes in the external environment and conduct analysis and consideration of response measures, including downside scenarios.
Skill Matrix
In nomination and selection of Directors and Senior Executive Officers, Advantest recognizes that noteworthy issues around the corporate management and communication with stakeholders have to be taken into consideration, in addition to our Purpose & Mission, management strategies, and business strategies. Our business is indispensable for the manufacturing of semiconductors, which support the development of our society, and also assumes the important function of supporting the stable operation of the facilities and systems in our society and industries, creating great opportunities for growth even in the surrounding areas. Advantest has selected the following 9 areas of management activities which are considered important for Advantest to grow the business in the medium to long term and realize the improvement of our corporate value: "Management & Corporate Strategy," "Semiconductor," "Technology," "Sales & Marketing," "Finance & Accounting," "Legal & Compliance," "Human Capital Management," "Global Business," and "Digital Transformation". The Board of Directors and the Nomination and Compensation Committee have discussed the essential "insight and experiences" required for the execution of duties and the fulfilment of the responsibly of supervision in the 9 areas, and established the required skill sets for Senior Executive Officers and Directors. The skills of the Directors will be as shown in the table below. Following the environmental changes, the skills required by Advantest will be constantly updated.
Details of Skill
-
*1The head of a large company or a company with complicated businesses or operations
-
*2The executive of a specialized service company in the relevant field
-
*3Supply Chain Management
As of July 31, 2026, the skills of the Directors and Senior Executive Officers will be as shown in the table below.
-
*Scroll down the table to see the entire list.
-
*Skills of the Senior Executive Officers (excluding those concurrently serving as directors) are as follows.
Reasons of Appointment of Outside Directors
Director Training
It is stated in the "Director Training Policy" as follows;
| Director Training Policy |
|---|
|
Outside Directors and Audit and Supervisory Committee Members were provided with opportunities to receive briefings from Senior Executive Officers regarding the status and challenges of their respective areas of responsibility and to engage in discussions with them. These opportunities enhanced their understanding of the Company's business conditions and key challenges and promoted mutual understanding with the Senior Executive Officers.
All Executive Directors have taken an external training program on governance. Because governance skills are important, we are expanding the scope of the training to Executive Officers who are not directors.
Audit and Supervisory Committee
During FY2025, the Audit and Supervisory Committee held 14 meetings, and the attendance rate of each member was 100%. The Audit and Supervisory Committee audited the execution of duties by directors, executive officers, and other business execution organizations in accordance with the audit policy, audit plan, priority audit items, and the assignment of duties established by the Audit and Supervisory Committee. During FY2025, The Audit and Supervisory Committee conducted on-site inspections and in-person interviews at major domestic and overseas consolidated subsidiaries and offices to the extent possible, and when it was difficult to do so, the Audit and Supervisory Committee conducted inspections and interviews via Web conference. Information obtained through on-site inspections by the standing member of the Audit and Supervisory Committee, attendance at important meetings such as the Executive Management Committee and Business Plan Meetings, and hearing business reports from executive divisions is shared with the entire Audit and Supervisory Committee. As a result of these audit activities, the Audit and Supervisory Committee provided feedback and recommendations to the Executive Management Committee, in addition to the directors and leaders of each unit involved when necessary.
Advantest's Audit and Supervisory Committee is composed of 1 inside director serving as a full-time Audit and Supervisory Committee member and 2 outside directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members, and is chaired by an outside director.
-
*As of July 31, 2026.
Accounting Auditors
Accounting Auditors perform accounting audits of the consolidated financial statements, accounting documents, etc., and produce an audit report. Regarding accounting audits, Advantest has audited with Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC and received predetermined audits. EY Shin Nihon LLC Audit Corporation (formerly Daiichi Audit Office) has been conducting listing audits of Advantest since 1983, when Advantest was listed on the Second Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The certified accountants who executed the accounting audit work of Advantest in FY2025 are Mr. Keiichi Wakimoto, Mr. Minoru Ota and Mr. Hiroyuki Nakada. The rotation of the certified public accountants is conducted appropriately at Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC and no certified public accountants are involved in accounting audits of same company for more than 7 consecutive fiscal years. Lead certified public accountants are not involved in accounting audits of the same company for more than 5 consecutive fiscal years. If a certified public accountant is involved in accounting audits of the same company for 7 consecutive fiscal years, he or she will be involved in accounting audits of that company only after an interval of 5 fiscal years. Lead certified public accountants who are involved in accounting audits of the same company for 5 consecutive fiscal years will not be involved in accounting audits of that company again. In addition, assistants performing Advantest's accounting audit work include those with expert knowledge such as system experts, with CPAs as the main constituents.
Internal Audits
Advantest has established an internal auditing team that comprises the Auditing Unit in headquarter and overseas subsidiaries. To verify whether Advantest's day-to-day operations are carried out appropriately and efficiently in accordance with the requirements of relevant domestic and overseas laws ordinances, and internal rules, the internal auditing team implements operational auditing, compliance auditing and internal controls auditing. Besides evaluating the efficiency of the internal controls system, the internal auditing team also provides support to assist in making improvements at individual business locations, when necessary. The internal auditing team hold appropriate qualifications (such as Certified Public Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor, or Qualified Internal Auditor), and all team members are committed to enhancing auditing quality.
Nomination and Compensation Committee
In 2005, Advantest established a Nomination and Compensation Committee as a discretionary institution. The Nomination and Compensation Committee consists of 3 Directors (including 2 outside Directors selected by the Board of Directors' resolution)*, with an outside Director serving as the chairperson of the committee. The Nomination and Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Board of Directors, discusses matters related to the nomination and compensation of Directors and Executive Officers, and makes proposals to the Board of Directors. The Committee met 14 times during FY2025. All the members were present at every Nomination and Compensation Committee meeting.
-
*As of July 31, 2026.
The main discussion agenda of the Nomination and Compensation Committee is as follows.
-
Candidates for Directors and Executive Officers and the Management Structure
Under the structure of directors effective after June 2025 and executive officers effective after April 2026, the Nomination and Compensation Committee considered appropriate candidates and proposed them to the Board of Directors. Regarding the organizational structure for directors effective after July 2026, the Nomination and Compensation Committee, after obtaining the views of each director, considered appropriate candidates and an optimal management structure and proposed its conclusions to the Board of Directors as appropriate. -
Evaluation of the Group CEO
The Nomination and Compensation Committee obtained evaluations of the Group CEO's performance for the fiscal year from directors excluding those concurrently serving as executive officers, and also obtained comments from the CEO. Based on these inputs, the Committee prepared a report, submitted it to the Board of Directors, and engaged in discussions and exchange of views. -
Succession planning for the Group CEO and CxOs
The Nomination and Compensation Committee prepared a proposal on measures to accelerate the development and strengthening of next-generation and next-next-generation management talent, which will contribute to succession planning for the Group CEO and CxOs, and engaged in discussions and exchange of views at the Board of Directors. -
Operation of Base Compensation, Performance-based Bonuses and Stock Compensation
Evaluating the performance of each executive officer against pre-defined roles and expected results, individual evaluations of executive bonuses for FY2024 were discussed, finalized and reported to the Board of Directors. The Nomination and Compensation Committee discussed and proposed to the Board of Directors the base compensation, performance indicators for performance-linked bonuses and stock compensation for FY2025. Furthermore, based on external benchmark data regarding executive compensation, the Nomination and Compensation Committee discussed a partial revision of the executive compensation system for FY2026, as well as base compensation and stock compensation, and submitted a proposal to the Board of Directors. -
Establishment of Stock Ownership Guidelines
From the perspective of sharing profits with shareholders, the Nomination and Compensation Committee established stock ownership guidelines and recommended to hold shares equivalent to 4 years' worth of base compensation for the Group CEO and 2 years' worth of base compensation for executive officers other than the Group CEO.
We have established a policy and procedures to assure the objectivity and transparency of the nomination and compensation of Directors, which are publicly available on the website.
Executive Management Committee
The Company delegates the necessary authorities to ensure the prompt and efficient performance of duties and the Executive Management Committee is positioned as a decision-making body for Advantest's important business execution matters. Of the operations for which authority has been delegated, important matters above a certain level are, in principle, deliberated at the Executive Management Committee. The Executive Management Committee meets approximately twice a month. The Executive Management Committee is composed of Senior Executive Officers, and Mr. Douglas Lefever is the chairperson.
CxO System
We have Introduced a CxO system to clarify management accountability in order to reinforce a global HQ management system further. As of August 2026, 8 CxOs are responsible for 9 CxO functions, with the Group CEO and Group COO sharing responsibility for each CxO. We have designated the CxOs as individuals who are suitable to assume these functions from a global perspective, and strive to build a system that enables management as a unified group.